Tag Archive: Prince Andrew

Want to watch a damage limitation exercise? Cover up? One rule for the rich and one for the scum. Off with her head. The divine right of shagging pervert Kings is still alive and kicking.

As for Dershowitz, well, read on!

Alan Dershowitz, Harvard law professor emeritus and legal legend, has defended himself loudly and often since being accused in January of sexual misconduct with an underage female. But does he have a proof problem?

Lawyers Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell think so. They represent victims of financier Jeffrey Epstein who are suing the government under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. One of Epstein’s victims, known in court documents as “Jane Doe #3” and identified in the media as Virginia Roberts, alleges that Epstein compelled her to have sex with Dershowitz while she was still a minor. Dershowitz has since moved to intervene in the CVRA suit in order to clear his name. Edwards and Cassell also filed a defamation suit against Dershowitz because of his public criticisms of them, and Dershowitz has since counterclaimed.

Edwards and Cassell are now arguing that while Dershowitz continues to call their client a liar, he has yet to produce specific evidence to bear out his accusation . . . in either suit.

Dershowitz’s lawyers argue that Jane Doe #3 (aka Virginia Roberts) waited too long before accusing Dershowitz and attempting to join the CVRA suit. They argue that it’s unfair to him for the court to consider Virginia Roberts’s allegations against him now, since “he would have been in a far better position to secure travel and other records needed to disprove these charges” if she had not waited so long.

On March 24, Edwards and Cassell filed their latest response on behalf of their clients in the CVRA suit, continuing to oppose Dershowitz’s intervention in the suit. They call out Dershowitz on his laches argument. They point out that:

“Dershowitz has already told worldwide news media that he has already collected all of the records and can provide irrefutable, documentary proof that Jane Doe No. 3 is lying. For example, Dershowitz has told the Boston Globe that ‘he will use his travel and credit card records, which he said he has fastidiously saved, to refute the allegations against him.’”

Edwards and Cassell go on to claim that Dershowitz has also not yet complied with discovery requests in their related defamation suit against Dershowitz. In that state court suit, counsel for Edwards and Cassell filed a motion to compel production of documents on February 23. In their motion to compel production in the defamation suit, Edwards and Cassell claim that Dershowitz has so far refused to produce “any documents” to them. For his part, Dershowitz responds that “the insinuation that Prof. Dershowitz is refusing to produce documents in the state court action is not only irrelevant [in the federal CVRA action], it is false – all responsive, non-privileged documents will be produced in a timely manner, as indicated in Dershowitz’s responses.”

The motion to compel in the state case remains pending. You can read Dershowitz’s Objections and Responses to Edwards and Cassell’s Initial Requests for Production and decide for yourself whether they are sufficient.

To be fair, many people would have a hard time assembling proof of where they were and what they were doing at some particular time years ago. But Dershowitz suggested to the media that he already had the proof at hand. Moreover, he insisted that part of what made his opponents’ conduct so egregious was that they could have easily come up with that evidence themselves if only they had responsibly investigated their client’s story.

Three months ago, when the story first hit headlines, Dershowitz told CNN, “If they [Edwards and Cassell] had just done an hours’ worth of work, they would have seen she is lying through her teeth.” He told the Today Show:

“Her lawyers Paul Cassell, a former Federal judge and Brad Edwards, deliberately and willfully filed this pleading which they knew I had no opportunity to respond to in court, without doing any investigation, if they had simply investigated the manifests of the airplanes, if they had checked my travel records, if they had asked me and I could have given the names of these people who are witnesses, they would know the stories, totally, completely false.”

He told Fox Business:

“They [Edwards and Cassell] did it for crass financial and political reasons. More to the point is [what] they didn’t do… I did the investigation in a day and was able to prove through all kinds of records that I couldn’t have been in these places. The woman is a serial liar. If they had done that investigation, they would have come to the same conclusion.”

These public comments, and numerous others like them, are troublesome for Dershowitz for two reasons.

First, they give the impression that Dershowitz was prepared months ago to produce just the sort proof that he has so far refused to provide in the discovery process. If Dershowitz had documentary evidence to prove his innocence all the way back in January, why hasn’t he shared it with the court yet?

Second, Dershowitz repeatedly chastised Edwards and Cassell for not doing the easy, obvious research that they were obligated as attorneys to do. If getting hold of evidence that would disprove Virginia Roberts’s allegations was as easy as Dershowitz said, why hasn’t he produced that evidence yet? And if it is actually quite difficult and time-consuming to amass the evidence, why did Dershowitz malign his opponents for not finding it? Either Dershowitz looks bad for not producing the documents or Dershowitz looks bad for trash-talking Edwards and Cassell, which strengthens their defamation claims against him.

What’s going on? If Dershowitz has the proof he’s promised, why hasn’t he offered it up yet, either in the CVRA proceedings with Virginia Roberts or the defamation battle with Edwards and Cassell?

Perhaps there are strategic considerations at work. As noted civil-liberties lawyer Harvey Silverglate recently suggested, Dershowitz might be holding back his exculpatory evidence “unless and until his accuser and her lawyers have specified, under oath, the times and places of the alleged abuse…. so that the accuser is not given the luxury of seeing the defense documents first and thus being enabled to construct detailed accusations around those documents.”

Perhaps Dershowitz hopes that the court will toss out Virginia Roberts’s joinder motion because of its own weaknesses or, less likely, simply strike the bits of Roberts’s story that mention Dershowitz. Dershowitz’s counsel has stated that:

“If the Court rejects the pending motion for joinder or the Protective Motion through which Petitioners also seek to add Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, then the Court should strike the scurrilous allegations against Professor Dershowitz, or, alternatively, determine the possible mootness of his motion for limited intervention. Of course, if the Court strikes the allegations against him sua sponte, Professor Dershowitz will withdraw his motion for limited intervention.”

If the court rejected her claim based on laches, for example, Dershowitz would no longer need to intervene in the CVRA suit. Withdrawing would free Dershowitz from the need to produce any further evidence in that suit. Moreover, he might gain some advantage in the parallel defamation suit. Depending upon why the CVRA court rejected Roberts’s claim, Dershowitz might argue in the defamation suit that the dismissal of her claim suggests that her accusations against him were, indeed, baseless. The more baseless her accusations, the closer Dershowitz gets to using truth as a defense in the defamation suit.

Perhaps Alan Dershowitz will offer the court evidence to show that Virginia Roberts is lying about having sex with him. Perhaps Dershowitz will soon produce documents in the discovery process in the defamation suit with Edwards and Cassell. But if not soon, when?


Yet another has-been charged to keep the masses happy. Still no news on the Paedophile politicians. And things have gone very quiet on the Prince Andrew front!

TV weatherman Fred Talbot has been jailed for five years for indecently assaultingFred Talbot arrested two schoolboys when he was a teacher.
Talbot, 65, a regular on the floating weather map in Liverpool’s Albert Dock for ITV’s This Morning show, was described as a ‘chancer’ who used his ‘extrovert personality’ to gain the trust of his victims.
Talbot, who was cleared of assaulting three other boys, was sentenced by Judge Timothy Mort at Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court today.
The judge told him: ‘You deliberately and indecently assaulted the two of them for your own gratification.’

The woman at the centre of the Prince Andrew ‘sex slave’ scandal has told a US court

Hear the one about the peado at Buckingham Palace?

Hear the one about the peado at Buckingham Palace?

that she believes the FBI has videos of her having sex with Jeffrey Epstein and his ‘powerful friends’ while she was underage.
Virginia Roberts, who alleges that she was loaned out to the Duke of York and other high-profile Epstein associates, also stated that she feared for her life while working as Epstein’s ‘sex slave’.
It comes a week after Epstein, an American billionaire who has been convicted of soliciting underage prostitution, hit out at ‘outlandish attacks’ by the ‘gossip media’ over the case.

Miss Roberts, 31, accuses Epstein, the Prince, and – among others – the leading American defence lawyer Alan Dershowitz of abusing her while she was underage.
Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell – also named in court documents – Mr Dershowitz and Jeffrey Epstein have vigorously denied the accusations.
A Buckingham Palace statement said: ‘It is emphatically denied that the Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship [with the woman].

“Well she wasn’t a woman at the time, she was a little girl”

prince andrew


Lawyers for Virginia Roberts – who claims she was forced to have sex with the prince – tried to serve papers on the Duke via the British Embassy in Washington.

A second attempt to have Prince Andrew testify on oath about his alleged contact with a woman who claims she was an underage ‘sex slave’ has failed.

Lawyers for Virginia Roberts, who claims she had sex three times with the Duke of York when she was 17, tried to serve papers on him via the British Embassy in Washington but they were returned to sender.

The fifth in line to the throne emphatically denies the American woman’s claims.

Last week, the Mirror revealed the initial letter sent to Buckingham Palace asking for the Duke to make a statement under oath was not accepted.

If he has nothing to hide why not show everyone, by testifying on oath. He can still lie if he wants

prince andrew

As the NSA say, “if you have nothing to hide, why be worried. Go on Andy, Testify

Lawyers for the alleged teenage ‘sex slave’ who says she slept with Prince Andrew are trying to serve papers on him via the British Embassy.
They claim the duke last week refused to accept a letter asking him to testify on oath about the allegations made by Virginia Roberts. In a bid to try again, Miss Roberts’ lawyer said yesterday: ‘We are attempting delivery through the British Embassy in Washington.’
The development came the day after Andrew spoke publicly to deny that he had sex with Miss Roberts.

In an unprecedented move, the duke used a televised speech in Davos to ‘reaffirm’ Buckingham Palace’s emphatic denials that he had ever had ‘any form of sexual contact or relationship’ with his accuser.
Reading from carefully scripted notes, the prince said: ‘Firstly I think I must, and want, for the record to refer to the events that have taken place in the last few weeks.
‘And I just wish to reiterate and to reaffirm the statements which have already been made on my behalf by Buckingham Palace.’

Just Change The Names

In the papers lodged in Florida, she says: “The second time I had sex with Prince Andrew was in Epstein’s New York mansion in spring 2001.

“I was 17 at time. Epstein was there, along with Maxwell and Andy. Epstein and Maxwell were making lewd jokes about ‘Randy Andy’.

“I had the impression Andy had come there to have sex with me. There was no other apparent purpose for him to be there.

“I was told to go upstairs with Andy and to go to the room I thought of as the dungeon. I had sex with Andy there. I was only paid $400 from Epstein for servicing Andy.

The third time I had sex with Andy was in an orgy on Epstein’s private island.

“Epstein, Andy, approximately eight other young girls, and I had sex together.”

The mum-of-three, who said she was “recruited” by Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of disgraced tycoon Robert Maxwell, aged 15, said she wanted to bring all the “powerful people” who had abused her to justice.

Virginia Roberts Letter filing claims

Virginia Roberts Letter filing claims

Prince Andrew’s ‘sex slave’ accuser could have her case thrown out – as flight log details appeared to back claims she met him three times.

Even though flight records emerged which show Virginia Roberts and the Duke were in the same place on the dates she says they met.

Looks like this scum may get off smelling of roses. Lets hope people see though this and demand some kind of hearing. Don’t let them sweep this under the rug.


If he has nothing to hide, lets see his take a lie detector test live on tv, because he wouldn’t lie to the camera now would he.

Prince Andrew will speak publicly for the first time this week about claims that he abused an underage

Prince Andrew puts his arms around 17-year-old Virginia Roberts. Virginia Roberts Says Prince Andrew Is A Creepy Letch: No News There

Prince Andrew puts his arms around 17-year-old Virginia Roberts. Virginia Roberts Says Prince Andrew Is A Creepy Letch: No News There

girl introduced to him by his friend, the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
In the first example of a senior Royal discussing intimate details of their private lives since Princess Diana’s sensational Panorama interview in 1995, the Duke of York will take the highly unusual step of facing a TV camera to deny the allegations levelled against him.
His intervention will come in front of around 300 captains of industry and politicians as he hosts his annual British business reception at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday.
Normally the event is off-limits to the media, but this year the Prince will invite a TV camera into the drinks party as he issues a further denial of the claims that he had sex three times with the then 17-year-old Florida schoolgirl Virginia Roberts in London, New York and the Virgin Islands in 2001.

The never-before-seen diary of a teenage “sex slave” spells out the “fearful” moment when she was coldlyLETTER ordered to allow Britain’s Prince Andrew to have sex with her.

In a bombshell world exclusive, RadarOnline.com has exclusively obtained the secret journal of the then 17-year-old employed to have sex with billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his rich and powerful pals — and it’s packed with scandalous claims about her illicit trysts, including with Andrew, the fifth in line to the British throne.

In 24 jaw-dropping pages, Virginia Roberts details the whirlwind 2001 sex trip she took with Epstein, and she dishes the dirt on how her master passed her off for a night of sordid sex with the British royal.

%d bloggers like this: